Augmented Reality Capstone Review – By Sector List
Here you will find a list of referenced research papers by sector to help identify each source used in the review. Augmented Reality Capstone Review – By Sector List.
Image Credit: Photo via Geralt on Pixabay under the Creative Commons License
Education Sector, Author, and remarks
Augmented Reality Capstone Review
Higher Education Principals, Gilbert, K. A. (2017) – Innovative leadership preparation: Enhancing legal literacy to create 21st-century ready principals.
Higher Education Teachers, Fernandez, M. (2017) – Augmented-virtual reality: How to improve education systems.
Higher Education Science, Bidarra, J., & Rusman, E. (2017) – Towards a pedagogical model for science education: Bridging educational contexts through a blended learning approach.
Higher Education Virtual Teams, Grober, B., & Baumol, U. (2017) – Why virtual teams work – state of the art.
Higher Education, Martin-Gutierrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015) – Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education.
Higher Education, Coimbra, M. M. T., Cardoso, T., & Mateus, A. (2015) – Augmented reality: An enhancer for higher education students in math’s learning?
Military Education, Hodicky, and Prochazka – An Autonomous Systems to study the proposals, ontologies, collaboration, law, and AR.
Aged Group Testing, Peleg-Adler, Lanir, and Korman, considered the impact of age and usage of handheld AR devices in a direction-finding task.
Surgeon Medical Education, Vavra examined 102 studies over two years for AR in surgery.
Adult Social Media Device Testing, Caron and Halpern (2016) by one questionnaire in response to Google Glass AR privacy. Included young adults from Chile, Spain, United States, Tunisia, and Canada. With 1,980 participants.
Adult AR Testing, Kim and Dey, (2016) monitored two sets of experiments with participants investigated visual and haptic augmentation in a simulated vehicle scenario.
Industrial Maintenance Adult Education, by Palmarini, Erkoyuncu, Roy, and Torabmostaedi, (2018). This article explored a systematic review of thirty articles over 21 years.
AR-based devices in Adult Education, by Turkan, Radkowski, Karabulut-Ilgu, Behzadan, and Chen, (2017) the belief that the empirical pilot evaluation of AR mobile applications in laboratory or on-location had potential to contribute to the learning.
AR-based applications for mobile devices from Canada by Harley, Poitras, Jarrell, Duffy, & Lajoie, (2016) used two measured questionnaire studies comparing AR with virtual and location-based settings using mobile devices.
Collaborative Learning Adults in Education – research by Cochrane, Narayan, & Antonczak, (2016) used 34 reviews, of which nine were as a co-writer. Based on five projects from 2011 — 2015 with smartphones, they studied a framework for collaborative learning using AR.
A review of trends in AR applications from a general historical overview in India by, Vyas and Bhatt (2017) cited 19 references from 1997- 2014 review current trends and challenges.
Full references appear below
Bidarra, J., & Rusman, E. (2017). Towards a pedagogical model for science education: Bridging educational contexts through a blended learning approach. Open Learning, 32(1), 6-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1265442
Caron, A. H., & Halpern, D. (2016). To glass or not to glass: A study on attitudes towards a wearable device. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Communication, 11(2), 1-17.
Chen, J., Han, K., Zhang, D., Li, Z., Li, Y., & Hou, L. (2017). Presurgical planning for supratentorial lesions with free slicer software and sina app. World Neurosurgery, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.146
Cochrane, T., Narayan, V., & Antonczak, L. (2016). A framework for designing collaborative learning environments using mobile AR. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(4), 293-316.
Coimbra, M. M. T., Cardoso, T., & Mateus, A. (2015). Augmented reality: An enhancer for higher education students in math’s learning? Procedia Computer Science, 67(-), 332-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.277
Fernandez, M. (2017). Augmented-virtual reality: How to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications, 7(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v7i1.373
Fombona, J., Pascual-Sevillano, M., & Gonzalez-Videgaray, M. (2017). M-learning y realidad aumentada: Revision de literatura cientifica en el repositorio WoS. Comunicar, 25(52), 63-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C52-2017-06
Gilbert, K. A. (2017). Innovative leadership preparation: Enhancing legal literacy to create 21st century ready principals. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 21(1), 1-17.
Grober, B., & Baumol, U. (2017). Why virtual teams work – state of the art. Procedia Computer Science, 121(-), 297-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.041
Harley, J. M., Poitras, E. G., Jarrell, A., Duffy, M. C., & Lajoie, S. P. (2016). Comparing virtual and location-based augmented reality mobile learning: Emotions and learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64 (3), 359-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9420-7
Hodicky, J., & Prochazka, D. (2017). 2017 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT), Military Technologies (ICMT), 2017 International Conference On, 743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MILTECHS.2017.7988855
Kim, S., & Dey, A. (2016). Augmenting human senses to improve the user experience in cars: Applying augmented reality and haptics approaches to reduce cognitive distances. Multimedia Tools & Applications, 75(16), 9587-9607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2712-4
Martinetti, A., Rajabalinejad, M., & van Dongen, L. (2016). Shaping the future maintenance operations: Reflections on the adoptions of augmented reality through problems and opportunities. Procedia CIRP, 59, 14-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.10.130
Martin-Gutierrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015). Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part B), 752-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093
Mourtzis, D., Zogopoulos, V., & Vlachou, E. (2017). Augmented reality application to support remote maintenance as a service in the robotics industry. Procedia CIRP, 63(-), 46-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.154
Palmarini, R., Erkoyuncu, J. A., Roy, R., & Torabmostaedi, H. (2018). A systematic review of augmented reality applications in maintenance. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 49, 215-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.06.002
Peleg-Adler, R., Lanir, J., & Korman, M. (2018). Full length article: The effects of aging on the use of handheld augmented reality in a route planning task. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 52-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.003
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
Shim, J., Yang, Y., Kang, N., Seo, J., & Han, T. (2016). Gesture-based interactive augmented reality content authoring system using HMD. Virtual Reality,20(1), 57-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0282-z
Turkan, Y., Radkowski, R., Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Behzadan, A. H., & Chen, A. (2017). Full length article: Mobile augmented reality for teaching structural analysis. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 34, 90-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.09.005
Vavra, P., Roman, J., Zonča, P., Ihnát, P., Němec, M., Kumar, J., . . . El-Gendi, A. (2017). Recent development of augmented reality in surgery: A review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2017, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4574172
Vyas, D. A., & Bhatt, D. (2017). Augmented reality (AR) applications: A survey on current trends, challenges, & future scope. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(5), 2724-2730.